ACF FounderLesson 6/8 · Status reportPT-BR
Visual course · v2 pet

Independent proof and continuity

Separate a review warning from a structural failure.

Core idea

The atlas was judged through three paths: structural validation, blind direction pairs, and pixel-level continuity. Each catches a different class of error.

Think of it this way: It is like checking a car: paperwork, a road test, and a mechanical inspection do not replace one another.

8 columns × 11 rows · last two rows = 16 look directions

How to read it

Structure confirms format, grid, and transparency.
Blind pairs test readability without revealing labels.
Continuity measures jumps between neighboring angles.

Technical layer

Continuity passed with two local outliers for review and no alpha holes. Blind validation passed cardinals and logged intermediate-diagonal warnings; independent visual QA closed as pass.

Check your mental model

Does reviewRequired=true automatically mean failure?

Evidence used

run-summary.json · validation-extended.json · review.json